THE FADE.....................

Subject: THE FADE..................... 2/20/2012, 11:39 pm

Make your choice, or suffer

Subject: Re: THE FADE..................... 2/20/2012, 11:41 pm

Welp, there goes 98% of Emory's playbook.

Subject: Re: THE FADE..................... 2/20/2012, 11:49 pm

how about limit it? once per game Question

Subject: Re: THE FADE..................... 2/20/2012, 11:53 pm

Mrhardbody201 wrote:

how about limit it? once per game Question

no

Pro Posts: 242 Join date: 2010-12-13

Ban it for the good of the league!

Veteran Posts: 482 Join date: 2010-08-16

looks like chi and dukebball the only voters so far

Waterboy Posts: 63 Join date: 2011-02-19

I got faded by chi for two touchdowns first game of the season!

Subject: Re: THE FADE..................... 2/21/2012, 11:19 am

Can we ban other overpowered things too?

Pro Posts: 90 Join date: 2010-08-03 Location: Van City

ban guys who user catch then?

Subject: Re: THE FADE..................... 2/21/2012, 11:38 am

i was gonna say ban sugar blitz

Pro Posts: 90 Join date: 2010-08-03 Location: Van City

ban guys who are too good?

Waterboy Posts: 63 Join date: 2011-02-19

so much

in this thread

Subject: Re: THE FADE..................... 2/21/2012, 3:33 pm

Ban canadians?

Special Teams Posts: 172 Join date: 2011-04-23

ban people who pass

Waterboy Posts: 11 Join date: 2012-01-31

Ban anyone who's gamertag isn't Millerguy123?

Subject: Re: THE FADE..................... 2/21/2012, 10:02 pm

What's wrong with user catching? And how's that relevant to a nearly unstoppable fade that the CPU does itself?

Pro Posts: 242 Join date: 2010-12-13

I agree the fade is worse. But I don't think it's out of the question to compare the two..especially some of the cases where people switch pull off the route then either come around to get some gay animation, or run out of bounds then back in to cut off the route etc.

And the sugar blitz...yeah that should probably go too. Who at EA had the idea to line both linebackers up at the line? Mad

Special Teams Posts: 172 Join date: 2011-04-23

Fooath wrote:

I agree the fade is worse. But I don't think it's out of the question to compare the two..especially some of the cases where people switch pull off the route then either come around to get some gay animation, or run out of bounds then back in to cut off the route etc.

And the sugar blitz...yeah that should probably go too. Who at EA had the idea to line both linebackers up at the line? Mad

tl;dr : waa i cant stop suga blitz and usa cach so i gotta cry to ban it

Waterboy Posts: 21 Join date: 2011-11-14

as far as banning the "Fade", im assuming you guys are meaning when the QB throws the high ball and results in the WR doing a jump ball.....then yes, i say BAN THE FUCK out of that. No skill in that AT ALL

Banning the sugar blitz? i disagree with that. If the play is designed to blitz the way it does, and the offense cant stop it, then thats the offense's fault. Doing other manual bull before the snap for the sugar blitz to get instant pressure, then yeah ban it.

Subject: Re: THE FADE..................... 2/22/2012, 1:57 pm

Subject: Re: THE FADE..................... 2/22/2012, 4:59 pm

Fooath wrote:

I agree the fade is worse. But I don't think it's out of the question to compare the two..especially some of the cases where people switch pull off the route then either come around to get some gay animation, or run out of bounds then back in to cut off the route etc.

And the sugar blitz...yeah that should probably go too. Who at EA had the idea to line both linebackers up at the line? Mad

Okay, I get what you mean, and I do agree to an extent. Some people user catch with turning animations that just pushes CBs out of the way, when you're in position for a deflection or a pick. But it's such a hard thing to rule on, as far as who is abusing what.

Subject: Re: THE FADE..................... 2/22/2012, 7:09 pm

RyanPelley wrote:

Fooath wrote:

I agree the fade is worse. But I don't think it's out of the question to compare the two..especially some of the cases where people switch pull off the route then either come around to get some gay animation, or run out of bounds then back in to cut off the route etc.

And the sugar blitz...yeah that should probably go too. Who at EA had the idea to line both linebackers up at the line? Mad

Okay, I get what you mean, and I do agree to an extent. Some people user catch with turning animations that just pushes CBs out of the way, when you're in position for a deflection or a pick. But it's such a hard thing to rule on, as far as who is abusing what.

the only thing that would work is if multiple people say the same thing you get punished. 3 strike system?