|
| Author | Message |
|---|
MethoSauRuS League Captain


Posts: 1610 Join date: 2010-07-27 Location: Denver
 | Subject: League Rule Additions? 8/17/2011, 1:23 am | |
| If you want something changed/added, say so m*****f******! |
|
 | |
Fooath Pro

Posts: 242 Join date: 2010-12-13
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/17/2011, 5:19 pm | |
| Are the default rules going to be different / more sim like they were for the almost-default last year? |
|
 | |
Mesmerise85 Veteran

Posts: 173 Join date: 2010-08-11
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/17/2011, 6:12 pm | |
| I like the trade rules and salary cap ideas from the "almost default." |
|
 | |
whYte N0iSE Veteran


Posts: 496 Join date: 2010-07-30 Age: 25 Location: ISU via Oklahoma
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/17/2011, 8:48 pm | |
| we will have to see how it goes and the general consensus, PMS is a democracy  |
|
 | |
Fooath Pro

Posts: 242 Join date: 2010-12-13
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/17/2011, 10:57 pm | |
| I liked the out-0f-position rules from the old default, and trade rules.
Salary cap is a hassle for the owners and the commish. From the sound of it keeping default going is hard enough without something like that. |
|
 | |
SEFnificent Pro


Posts: 161 Join date: 2010-07-28
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/18/2011, 8:48 am | |
| |
|
 | |
MethoSauRuS League Captain


Posts: 1610 Join date: 2010-07-27 Location: Denver
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/20/2011, 3:52 am | |
| | Fooath wrote: | I liked the out-0f-position rules from the old default, and trade rules.
Salary cap is a hassle for the owners and the commish. From the sound of it keeping default going is hard enough without something like that. |
so you want the DE/OLB sort of rules added? |
|
 | |
Mesmerise85 Veteran

Posts: 173 Join date: 2010-08-11
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/20/2011, 4:35 am | |
| | MethoSauRuS wrote: | | Fooath wrote: | I liked the out-0f-position rules from the old default, and trade rules.
Salary cap is a hassle for the owners and the commish. From the sound of it keeping default going is hard enough without something like that. |
so you want the DE/OLB sort of rules added? |
yes. |
|
 | |
MethoSauRuS League Captain


Posts: 1610 Join date: 2010-07-27 Location: Denver
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/20/2011, 4:37 am | |
| added.
POSITION RULES
OLB/DE: You can NOT start a player out-of-position here. They CAN situationally. (such as putting OLB's at DE on passing downs)
DE/DT: No rules.
FS/SS: No rules.
CB/S: No rules.
TE/WR: You can NOT start a player out-of-position here. They CAN situationally at slot.
RB/WR: You can NOT play a player out-of-position here in any situation. Running backs must line up in the backfield. |
|
 | |
dbake 333 Veteran


Posts: 482 Join date: 2010-08-16
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/20/2011, 12:20 pm | |
| | MethoSauRuS wrote: | added.
POSITION RULES
OLB/DE: You can NOT start a player out-of-position here. They CAN situationally. (such as putting OLB's at DE on passing downs)
DE/DT: No rules.
FS/SS: No rules.
CB/S: No rules.
TE/WR: You can NOT start a player out-of-position here. They CAN situationally at slot.
RB/WR: You can NOT play a player out-of-position here in any situation. Running backs must line up in the backfield. |
RBs line up at WR all the time. The rest of it is cool, but I vote to allow RBs to line up situationally at WR. |
|
 | |
MethoSauRuS League Captain


Posts: 1610 Join date: 2010-07-27 Location: Denver
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/20/2011, 2:36 pm | |
| | dbake 333 wrote: | | MethoSauRuS wrote: | added.
POSITION RULES
OLB/DE: You can NOT start a player out-of-position here. They CAN situationally. (such as putting OLB's at DE on passing downs)
DE/DT: No rules.
FS/SS: No rules.
CB/S: No rules.
TE/WR: You can NOT start a player out-of-position here. They CAN situationally at slot.
RB/WR: You can NOT play a player out-of-position here in any situation. Running backs must line up in the backfield. |
RBs line up at WR all the time. The rest of it is cool, but I vote to allow RBs to line up situationally at WR. |
when do RB's line up at WR "all the time" |
|
 | |
Fooath Pro

Posts: 242 Join date: 2010-12-13
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/20/2011, 6:19 pm | |
| OLBs shouldn't be allowed at DE at all! And running CBs at safety with the speed is lame shit!
Boo I say! boo! |
|
 | |
whYte N0iSE Veteran


Posts: 496 Join date: 2010-07-30 Age: 25 Location: ISU via Oklahoma
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/20/2011, 6:42 pm | |
| lol i dont much care either way but ill let you in on a secret...mr Metho wants to run von at DE on passing downs...shhhh  |
|
 | |
dbake 333 Veteran


Posts: 482 Join date: 2010-08-16
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/20/2011, 7:26 pm | |
| RBs split out all the time... |
|
 | |
MethoSauRuS League Captain


Posts: 1610 Join date: 2010-07-27 Location: Denver
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/20/2011, 7:28 pm | |
| | Fooath wrote: | OLBs shouldn't be allowed at DE at all! And running CBs at safety with the speed is lame shit!
Boo I say! boo! |
even in the NFL they have OLBs put their hands down and blitz as DE's on most passing downs
|
|
 | |
whYte N0iSE Veteran


Posts: 496 Join date: 2010-07-30 Age: 25 Location: ISU via Oklahoma
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/20/2011, 8:29 pm | |
| they call that the 3-4  |
|
 | |
Mesmerise85 Veteran

Posts: 173 Join date: 2010-08-11
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/20/2011, 8:42 pm | |
| I'm with fooath on the CBs playing safety. safeties playing corner is fine (idk why anyone would really do it but still). |
|
 | |
bigstickybomb Veteran


Posts: 387 Join date: 2010-08-01
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/20/2011, 10:08 pm | |
| | dbake 333 wrote: | | RBs split out all the time... |
I Agree with bake... faulk, bush, hillis etc. even fullbacks split out
 |
|
 | |
Mesmerise85 Veteran

Posts: 173 Join date: 2010-08-11
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/20/2011, 10:15 pm | |
| They shouldn't be started there and only there. If it's once in a while with the use of packages I think it's fine. |
|
 | |
dbake 333 Veteran


Posts: 482 Join date: 2010-08-16
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/20/2011, 10:19 pm | |
| | Mesmerise85 wrote: | | They shouldn't be started there and only there. If it's once in a while with the use of packages I think it's fine. |
Exactly.. for both RB and OLB |
|
 | |
whYte N0iSE Veteran


Posts: 496 Join date: 2010-07-30 Age: 25 Location: ISU via Oklahoma
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/21/2011, 12:52 pm | |
| hell yeah if you constantly wna start ppl at all positions i have a feeling whos gna get hurt  |
|
 | |
MethoSauRuS League Captain


Posts: 1610 Join date: 2010-07-27 Location: Denver
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/21/2011, 3:11 pm | |
| well when I'm running willis magahee at WR, you'll all regret this decision  |
|
 | |
RealitysProof Special Teams


Posts: 55 Join date: 2011-01-11
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/24/2011, 7:31 pm | |
| starting just any bogus ass stupid mothafucking cockblowing speed receiver just cuz of the speed ..... save that shit G chew on some dick bubble yum bumm. |
|
 | |
Mrhardbody201 Veteran


Posts: 914 Join date: 2010-07-27 Age: 19 Location: New Jersey
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/24/2011, 7:49 pm | |
| | RealitysProof wrote: | | starting just any bogus ass stupid mothafucking cockblowing speed receiver just cuz of the speed ..... save that shit G chew on some dick bubble yum bumm. |
you jelly? |
|
 | |
Cjok1051 Veteran


Posts: 349 Join date: 2010-07-27
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/24/2011, 7:57 pm | |
| What if you run a 2-4-5 as your primary set? Then you'll have OLB's on the line alot. |
|
 | |
Fooath Pro

Posts: 242 Join date: 2010-12-13
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/24/2011, 8:32 pm | |
| | Cjok1051 wrote: | | What if you run a 2-4-5 as your primary set? Then you'll have OLB's on the line alot. |
So if you want to run OLBs at DE use the 3-4 and 2-4-5 sets that have them hand down!
Boo with dime sets and olbs at de! |
|
 | |
RealitysProof Special Teams


Posts: 55 Join date: 2011-01-11
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/24/2011, 9:14 pm | |
| | Mrhardbody201 wrote: | | RealitysProof wrote: | | starting just any bogus ass stupid mothafucking cockblowing speed receiver just cuz of the speed ..... save that shit G chew on some dick bubble yum bumm. |
you jelly? | Peanut butter and jelly G this year I jams ..... watch how many sub 70 overall players get ultra burn shit stupid 50tyson stupid wit crack head on top |
|
 | |
BIGxSIPx18 Veteran


Posts: 265 Join date: 2010-07-27
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/25/2011, 11:22 am | |
| putting rbs at WR will give room for more money plays and glitches, so all you so called "sim players" shouldn't want it to be in the league if u really want to have a goodie two shoes league. AS FOR ME THOUGH IDC WHAT THE FUCK YOU DO... NONE OF YOU FAGS CAN BEAT ME ANYWAY SO DO WHAT U MUST!!!!!! |
|
 | |
whYte N0iSE Veteran


Posts: 496 Join date: 2010-07-30 Age: 25 Location: ISU via Oklahoma
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/25/2011, 3:34 pm | |
| its not cheating if i start Adrian Peterson at rb is it? |
|
 | |
riseandconquer Pro

Posts: 90 Join date: 2010-08-03 Location: Van City
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/25/2011, 4:57 pm | |
| ya rbs at wr might happen irl but im madden i member sip or somethong last yr led the lg in rec with reggie bush as a wr, so im not a fan of seeing something dumb like that happen again....and olbs at de is ok once in awhile just not every play like that 2-4-5 playbook uses them almost every play at de and that seems cheesy |
|
 | |
bigstickybomb Veteran


Posts: 387 Join date: 2010-08-01
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/25/2011, 6:30 pm | |
| | T 4 L ii B 4 N wrote: | | putting rbs at WR will give room for more money plays and glitches, so all you so called "sim players" shouldn't want it to be in the league if u really want to have a goodie two shoes league. AS FOR ME THOUGH IDC WHAT THE FUCK YOU DO... NONE OF YOU FAGS CAN BEAT ME ANYWAY SO DO WHAT U MUST!!!!!! |
so called sim players would use rbs at wr rarely |
|
 | |
bigstickybomb Veteran


Posts: 387 Join date: 2010-08-01
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/25/2011, 6:30 pm | |
| | T 4 L ii B 4 N wrote: | | putting rbs at WR will give room for more money plays and glitches, so all you so called "sim players" shouldn't want it to be in the league if u really want to have a goodie two shoes league. AS FOR ME THOUGH IDC WHAT THE FUCK YOU DO... NONE OF YOU FAGS CAN BEAT ME ANYWAY SO DO WHAT U MUST!!!!!! |
so called sim players would use rbs at wr rarely |
|
 | |
dbake 333 Veteran


Posts: 482 Join date: 2010-08-16
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/25/2011, 8:31 pm | |
| i know some ppl dont like the 2-4-5 but it = 2 lineman, 4 linebackers. there are olb lined up to rush the passer but they do not do so on every play. in the 3-4 an OLB is a pass rusher anyway so calling him a de or olb is useless, it is essentially the same thing. if u have suggs, matthews, ware, etc and ur not using him to rush the passer on every play then ur not being very smart or realistic in my opinion.  |
|
 | |
dbake 333 Veteran


Posts: 482 Join date: 2010-08-16
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 8/25/2011, 8:31 pm | |
| just keep OLBs out of DE in the 4-3  |
|
 | |
Mesmerise85 Veteran

Posts: 173 Join date: 2010-08-11
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 9/4/2011, 2:46 am | |
| For a supposed "sim" league we have a lot of guys who just throw 80% percent of the time. I remember a "rule" last year that was never enforced, but it was had to be at least 10 rushing attempts (which is not a lot). I think this should be enforced if not a higher minimum, 15 prehaps? Teams need to be more balanced |
|
 | |
KwakKwak Veteran


Posts: 231 Join date: 2010-08-29 Age: 26 Location: Austin
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 9/4/2011, 10:09 am | |
| |
|
 | |
Mocexx Statistician


Posts: 210 Join date: 2011-03-10 Location: San Diego
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 9/4/2011, 3:21 pm | |
| | Quote: | | For a supposed "sim" league we have a lot of guys who just throw 80% percent of the time. I remember a "rule" last year that was never enforced, but it was had to be at least 10 rushing attempts (which is not a lot). I think this should be enforced if not a higher minimum, 15 prehaps? Teams need to be more balanced Neutral |
Completely agree. Saints ran the least last year, and what they still ran on 36% of plays? 10 is nothing per game, and 15 would be great. |
|
 | |
Fooath Pro

Posts: 242 Join date: 2010-12-13
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 9/4/2011, 6:01 pm | |
| step your game up and maybe people wouldn't pass as much, son. |
|
 | |
dbake 333 Veteran


Posts: 482 Join date: 2010-08-16
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 9/6/2011, 4:31 pm | |
| i like the idea of a rushing limit. maybe 10 carries, unless u lose by 20+ or have fewer than 15 pass attempts |
|
 | |
bigstickybomb Veteran


Posts: 387 Join date: 2010-08-01
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 9/10/2011, 4:47 pm | |
| there should be a limit to how many time you can use a play run/pass i played sum 1 the other day who used the same play over 13 times just doesnt seem sim |
|
 | |
drunk_spartan88 Waterboy
Posts: 10 Join date: 2011-10-04
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 10/6/2011, 12:52 pm | |
| Any rules on playing CPU? Waiting till day off advance? Any rule on Using scouting? I don't use it personally but if some one uses it on me I will too |
|
 | |
dbake 333 Veteran


Posts: 482 Join date: 2010-08-16
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 10/6/2011, 1:56 pm | |
| Don't play cpu without asking commish, there's only one real cpu team right now |
|
 | |
RyanPelley Veteran


Posts: 313 Join date: 2010-11-07 Age: 24 Location: Indiana
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 3/4/2012, 9:32 am | |
| How about something against snapping the ball, running to the sideline under no pressure, and throwing across the field to an open man, because DBs wont follow... It's straight lobby bullshit. |
|
 | |
Fooath Pro

Posts: 242 Join date: 2010-12-13
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 3/14/2012, 5:40 pm | |
| I suggest we toughen position change rules to limit players to their unit group. So Dline can only play Dline. LB only LB. Oline only Oline. CB only CB etc.
Maybe an exception for OLB at DE on third and 10+.
OLBs are playing DE more often than not. Have corners at safety. HBs at FB on dives etc etc. |
|
 | |
Mocexx Statistician


Posts: 210 Join date: 2011-03-10 Location: San Diego
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 3/14/2012, 6:19 pm | |
| Forgot to mention HB at WR. Like Reggie Bush for example should not be a starting WR on your team. |
|
 | |
AUGS Waterboy

Posts: 21 Join date: 2012-01-27 Age: 23 Location: Indiana
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 3/14/2012, 7:55 pm | |
| | Fooath wrote: | I suggest we toughen position change rules to limit players to their unit group. So Dline can only play Dline. LB only LB. Oline only Oline. CB only CB etc.
Maybe an exception for OLB at DE on third and 10+.
OLBs are playing DE more often than not. Have corners at safety. HBs at FB on dives etc etc. |
But..... Bush at WR is fine? |
|
 | |
Fooath Pro

Posts: 242 Join date: 2010-12-13
 | Subject: Re: League Rule Additions? 3/14/2012, 9:00 pm | |
| That is part of the "etc". I wasn't going to name every position. "Unit group" meaning their actual position. QB, HB, FB, TE, T, G, C, WR, DE, DT, OLB, MLB, CB, S.
Or even just within that, so linebackers are one, defensive line are one, and offensive line are one. And the rest have to stay at their position.
So no HB at FB or WR unless the formation itself puts them there (no manually putting them with right button sub, or putting them there on depth chart). Same goes for FBs only playing FB. CB only playing CB. on and on. "sim". The rare cases of OLBs lining up at DE are usually the formation specifics where they put them with their hands down. |
|
 | |
|